Case Study 4 - Runner Systems Comparison
Before
( Cold runner)
No. of cavity | 4 |
Material used | PA66 GF30% |
Material cost (Est.) | US$ 4.60/kg |
Qty/Month/Mould | 300K pcs |
After
( Mini runner)
Product application: Automotive
Runner System |
Runner weight |
Cycle time |
Productivity/day | |
Before | Cold runner | 3,145 g/pc | 8,75 sec/pc | 9,578 pcs |
After | Mini runner | 0,79 g/pc | 1,88 sec/pc | 44,578 pcs |
Approx.saving (cost of material @ US$ 3.00/kg& molding machine @ US$ 20/hr) |
0,0975 g/pc (75%) | 0.62 sec/pc (26%) | 11.055pcs (34%) | |
US$ 0.01083 /pc | US$ 0.0125 /pc | |||
Total saving (Material + Machine) | US$ 0.02333 /pc | |||
MSK mini runner system cost | US$ 4,600 | |||
Estimated ROI
ROI =
|
0.7 months | |||
Approx.saving (Total saving x Qty/mth x 12) |
Year 1 – US$ 79,088 Year 2 – US$ 83,988
|